Scottish Green Party Women’s Network hits out at Liz Truss’ comments on trans rights
Liz Truss is the UK minister for women and equalities, but her recent evidence to the Women and Equalities Select Committee suggested her government is more likely to take equal rights away than enforce them.
Truss was there to discuss reform of the Gender Recognition Act (GRA), which the UK Government promised two years ago. Distressingly, not only did Truss kick that into the tall grass again, she also strayed into using the same buzzword dog-whistle language that has been used by right-wing groups in stirring up fear and mistrust of trans people.
Thankfully, equalities are mostly devolved issues when it comes to Scotland, but the normalisation of the rhetoric should worry us all. For example, Truss said: “the protection of single-sex spaces…is extremely important.” This is deliberate blurring of lines of what GRA reform is, and allows.
GRA reform is more accurately called ‘Birth Certificate Reform’ in Australia. It proposes exactly that: to allow transgender people to be able to change their birth certificate more easily.
The current process is onerous, stressful and overly medicalised for people who are already under enormous emotional strain. It is not in keeping with international best practice. Australia has now joined Ireland, Malta, Norway, Argentina, Portugal and Belgium in this modest reform.
There is a political strategy that has seized on this fairly basic piece of legislation and conflated it with other issues to ‘divide and conquer’ the equal rights movement. There are all kind of outlandish and dangerous claims about it. Liz Truss’ “single-sex spaces” is one example. To call for their “protection” assumes they are under threat from GRA reform, but when has anyone ever checked your birth certificate at a toilet door? No one needs to pretend to switch gender to force their way in.
The particular danger in Liz Truss’ use of language is that it appears to accept the falsehood that trans women are a danger to other women and girls and that there must be “checks and balances” to keep us safe. The reality is that trans women are overwhelmingly in danger, not a danger to others. The same fear-mongering that was once used about homosexuality is now being brought to bear on trans people.
We also find in Liz Truss’ speech the alarming suggestion of reducing support for trans children and young people. The equalities minister’s call to stop “irreversible changes” would be an introduction of a new form of inequality into medical practice.
Proper and timely support for trans young people saves lives. Trans people already have to wait years and years for treatment. This leads to trans people having high rates of mental illness, self-harm and suicide. That truly is irreversible. Trans lives matter.
The Scottish Green’s Women’s Network is clear. We support the GRA reforms as sensible measures to reduce the huge burden on trans people, and hopefully they will not be derailed in Scotland as they have been allowed to do at Westminster. We also support self-identification. We believe trans women are women and we support legal recognition of a non-binary gender identity. We want to keep all women safe and we recognise the additional dangers and prejudice that trans women face. All women and non-binary people are safe and welcome with us.
If you agree, please sign up to our Women’s Pledge.
PS. Bright Green has big plans for the future, but we need your input. Take 2 minutes to see what we’re planning and tell us your thoughts.
Image credit: Scottish Green Party
Why is it suddenly so unacceptable for women to feel they need to retain spaces in which they are more vulnerable as single sex. Why do women always have to provide emotional work and support of the feelings of others, in this case male born people?? Women who feel threatened by a male presence in such circumstances shouldn’t have to explain and bargain just to have basic considerations given to their feelings. Nor should they be vilified and abused for feeling that discomfort or told they need Orwellian “re- education” I wonder if Bright Green have read the recent Guardian article about the sexual abuse of some girls at school? Removing single sex spaces will remove the last refuge for girls in such cases. I was lucky as I went to a girls school.
There are some very strange claims in this statement. To suggest that ensuring children don’t undergo treatments that are life-changing at a time when they do not have the capacity to understand the full implications is NOT “reducing support”. On the contrary, it is likely to lead to more effective and supportive psychological support. There is also the statement that her statements are ‘right-wing’ ‘dog-whistles’. It seems to me extraordinary that protecting single-sex spaces is characterised like this. Women worked for decades to provide single-sex spaces for those who have experienced rape, abuse from a partner etc, but now apparently we radicals who set these things up are right-wingers. It makes clear you understand neither history nor those women and men wanting simple recognition of women’s needs.
And what on earth happened to science? You do understand how that works, surely?
Simply, ditto above.
Or rather, ditto the previous comments.
There is profound and real sex-based discrimination in societies all over the world. Why can’t the Green Party, my party, see that sex-based disadvantage and gender identity-based issues are two completely separate areas for debate and policy.
‘We believe trans women are women’: People can believe all sorts of things and also make supportive statements “I am a Berliner”, “We are all Charlie Hebdo”. That great. And that is what ‘We believe trans women are women’ is, just a supportive statement. Of course trans-women are actually trans-women. Their gender identity is female and sex class is male, that is why they are *transwomen* after all!
Birth certificate need to record someones biological sex as observed at birth. All documents relating to health and potential first responder emergency situation also need to be clear about sex category. Gender identity can be added, but should not bury essential information that will determine many health outcomes and is needed for social data and statistics.
This makes the green party look like a bunch of idiots. Greens are supposed to base their policies on sound science. The trans ideology is faith based and unsubstantiated, and if the green party requires us to believe in gendered souls then we cannot hope to be taken seriously on climate change.
Rubbish.
One cannot change sex.
Men cannot be women or vice versa.
Science denialism is pitiful from a supposed environmental party.
Lunacy.