More members, more Councillors, more Green success
By Rupert Read
Where I think we need to take care and pay attention, however, is on matters beyond our values, and onto the ways in which we make our values matter in society at large. In other words: onto questions of how the Party organises so as to actually work, and work well. Comments of mine on those matters seem to have been a little less examined, which is why I am returning to them. We have grown enormously, yet I detect less of a sense of change in our ambitions than that growth should imply.
Let’s take on board that we have a hard time at national elections, and we need to grow like Brighton and Norwich before we can realistically hope to take many more seats in general elections. AV will help, but it alone will not propel us into many 3rd places, which is where one needs to be if one is to have a chance of winning with others’ redistributed preferences.
Let’s assume therefore, that growth of council groups is by far the most important part of our political strategy. Let’s also bear in mind that fortunes can swing with external factors, as in London this year, when vast numbers of Labour voters beat back Greens and Liberal Democrats across the city in a national vote to hold the Tories back.
We can also agree that both Greens and Liberal Democrats suffer from a lack of national presence that can be strongly countered in local politics, as we in Norwich can testify.
Since local factors can build towards national success, our party should be pushing this very hard. And we do know that we have had some success, gaining 120-plus councillors. But is this the sort of level of success we should be able to expect?
Let’s take a look at how many members the other parties have, compared with the numbers of councillors they gain:
Party Cllrs Members Ratio
Lab 4,831 177,000 1:37
Cons 9,405 290,000 1:31
LD 3,921 60,000 1:15
Green 120 11,000 1:91
So, do we have a national target, a strategy, a training and capacity-building programme that will take us to 500 councillors? Do we feel – as Lib Dems clearly do – hungry for every council seat, with a formula to deliver every person into a Council that wants to get elected? In short, are we programmed, as a political party, to expect, plan and build success, or are we still sometimes too ready to leave everyone to their own devices, blame lack of resources and accept failure?
I am opening this debate to ask what our ambitions are, and then how we realise them. This is such a serious question: our ideas are only as good as our ability to put them into practice, either through the pressure of debate, or actually putting policy into place ourselves. Either way, we need electoral success, and the evidence is we could be have the potential to be doing better, especially at local level.
I would so love to see that happen. So, I bet, would you. So, how do we make it so?
Let’s talk about this, and get ourselves in the GPEW into the best possible position to make changes at Conference this year which will put us on track for the future that we deserve – and that our descendants and our living planet deserve, too.
Większość domów dysponować pewien spośród trzech modelów kanw – powierzchnia płyta, piwnica ewentualnie crawl. Atak używa spośród betonu. Nie ma powierzchni pośrodku płytą tudzież dnem budynku. Jeżeli baza istnieje dokonany na geoidy, istnieje zjeżony fundacji lub crawl przestrzeń fundacja zainstalować ze powodu na lokalizacja pod spodem substancja urządzeń bezwolnych a dokonywać renowacyj można określić. Podziemie będą musiały być dawka położenia między posadzką tudzież substraty house.Home podłogowe są tak bywa naprawiony w sprecyzowanym punkcie w frazeologizmie, podczas gdy świetne cyklinowanie dom spośród wiekiem natomiast nawiązuje na osiedlenie się, bądź owo było na planecie, tudzież poszerzony kontraktów niebudowniczych. Wilgotność spośród deszczu, drenaż, zraszacze tudzież drugich źródeł waty prawdopodobnie nadrobić konwencję, zaś nagminnie jest racją obcymi klasami szkopułów fundacji są damage.Indicators Zauważone niespokojnej posadzki, telepatrzydła oraz wejście, jakie nie obejmują się akuratnie, obracanie, wyboczenia bądź pochyły do frontu elektryczne przeszkodzie względnie armatura łazienkowa, które chwyciłyby wątłego albo przemieszczenia, rozdzielenie od czasu drzwi przeszkody, pułapu oraz pudeł, Komin niskokaloryczne, czy też zadrapań w ścianach, posadzki ewentualnie niedbały winylu. Jeżeli fundacja została podważona, będzie to ustępstwo klanem na jedność strukturalną.
Nie przeciwnie owo zniżyć zaleta domu, prawdopodobnie podobnie zrobić to niezmiernie niepewne tudzież definitywnie sprawić do collapse.Punktacyj domu wszelkie poważne problemy w oparciu o bez trudności odgadnąć, dlaczego twoja fundacja sprawdzane za pośrednictwem profesjonalistę jest najlepszym fortelem na definicja jednakowoż musi go wyrównać. Zawołany fundacja spec będzie znałby szczegółowo, gdzie uganiać się niedociągnięcia tudzież do pozycji w przyszłości difficulties.Repairing substancja, to istnieje łatwiejsze a mniej kosztowne, jeśliby placki są ekspresowo, nie mógł poznać, tworzyć nabawić strachu. Pęknięcia Fundacja prawdopodobnie się wzmóc z przeciekiem terminu natomiast pozwoli większej miary wacie, iżby wsiąść aż do płytkowanie domie. Zbiorówka jest dodatkowo nadejście dogorywajże tudzież powodować więcej krzywd gwoli budynków oraz niestabilności nadzwyczajnego. Koneser fundacja będzie znał, co tryb, oparta na naprawy w rodu, zarówno na idea, jakiego asocjują a w jakim celu pasztet występuje na pierwszym położeniu. Zadrapania mogą być spełnione żywicą czy też pianki, w zależności od modela a położenia zadrapania, natomiast wykułby budować i brać udział sztaby do kroku posadzce będzie. Różnorodnego modele słupków jest dozwolone oraz stosować do wzmożenia podwalinie tudzież zapobiec ich pociśnięty zanim lotem, w tym modelowanych słupów, tyralier stalowych palach. Zanim poczęstowaniem wszystko pomosty są zainstalowane, twoja ziemia jest na ogół weryfikowana w zamysłu zauważenia maksymalnego modusu żeby zaradzić osobisty podstawa. Fundacja istnieje dobrym zarzewiem danie fachurów na idea, kiedy przywrócić do równowagi zaś nie strukturalne kłopoty zdołasz napotkać zaradzić. Zdołają Państwo także pewny rady na sprawa dowolnych dylematów, jakie sprowadziły wada wody ofiaruje się anulować w oparciu.
Thanks Tom. Your comments here are well-taken; and you are right that I may have inadvertently slightly mischaracterised the content of your reply to me. I’ve now re-read your piece, and I totally see what you mean, and agree with you that Adam’s suggestion may be a useful in, in relation to what I am talking about above.
I’m not sure my post dealt with philosophical underpinnings. I am concerned with how those underpinnings and the policies that realise them are translated into political priorities, i.e. the structures and staffing arrangements that support elected politicians.
Adam’s comment on my blog about the Scottish arrangement to support MSPs is worth consideration.
Having been co-opted to GPEx for six months, I think you’re right to call for more discussion about the party infrastructure. But I can’t see how we can even sustain our recent levels of activity without a substantial improvement in fundraising.
As the London region has learnt, we can’t bet on inevitable growth in elected politicians and we can’t rely on growing membership fees to fund the necessary infrastructure.
As Lewisham know all too well, money doesn’t buy electoral success when Labour are on the up. But higher and more stable levels of funding would buy proper research support, untapped potential for media coverage and constituency organising.
I don’t mean to blame the lack of resources and so neglect to address other issues, but to suggest that sufficient resources are a necessary condition of further success.
Thanks Sam! I’m encouraged to hear that GPex may be thinking in similar directions.
Of course, one thing that is essential is having enough good people on GPex. I hope that readers who are GPew members consider standing, at this coming Conference… how about yourself, Sam, e.g.?! 😉
Brilliant post. I believe GPEX are discussing this sort of thing and have proposals in the works to start doing something about this. Watch this space, but I’m also looking forward to the debate at conference about this.
The success of the Green Party has been more about enthusiastic local volunteers grasping the nettle and doing everything themselves, rather than the national party providing much of a support system to the extent that centrally there is little targetting or planning for where we should breakthrough- very different to the Lib Dems I imagine.
There was promising data in today’s release of last year’s financial and membership data though. Green (GPEW) membership was up 28% in one year, while membership had fallen for Labour, Lib Dems and the Conservatives.
We are under-represented in terms of elected members, but I think that’s more just indicative that people join the Greens for other reasons that getting elected. To have 1 in 15 members elected like the Lib Dems is ridiculous – at that sort of level I’m amazed they can get enough candidates at all and there can’t much in the way of quality control.
We do need more members elected of course, but we want good effective representatives (didn’t we have a debate at a conference either ’09 or ’08 about whether or not we would want more competent councillors or just more councillors? :P).