NUS conference: Porter apologises for tactical mistakes
Outgoing NUS president Aaron Porter has this afternoon apologised for ‘tactical’ mistakes over the last year. Aaron, who was giving the opening speech at this year’s NUS conference in Newcastle, admitted that there hadn’t been a serious strategy for what the student movement would do after the 10th of November demonstration.
He did, however, offer a full throated defense of NUS’ policy position, calling on students not to support free education at this week’s conference. In his speech, to roughly 1000 delegates, Porter passionately defended the idea of a student contribution to the cost of Higher Education, arguing that no major political party at Westminster is in favour of free higher education, and claiming that investment in Sure Start centres is more important.
However, it was his apology for mistakes over the last year that received the warmest applause. While highlighting his success at uniting the student movement in the months before the national demonstration, he admitted that there hadn’t been enough consderation of tactics after this point, “I hold my hands up” he said, accepting blame for this. “While there is no place for violence against people or against property unless you are defending democracy itself” Porter said “there is a place for peaceful occupations” – highlighting such protests both on campuses, and at Fortnum & Mason’s.
He then explained that he believed his continuation as president would, he believed, have led to a split student movement, and discussion of his role in this tactical debate: “we must have this tactical debate, but not mid-battle”
we’ll have the full text of the speech soon.
I think this just confirms what an awful NUS president he was.
Since the vote his entire focus has been on lobbying universities to charge less than the maximum amount. For many, especially the less competitive, the huge cuts (in some cases 100%) to government HE spending mean they either have to charge the maximum amount to break even or cut staff and support resulting in the worsening of academic quality.
The whole “right to recall” of MPs has been a huge gimmick and waste of time and money.
And i find the encouragement to delegates to back candidates who support tuition fees (or this silly graduate tax) rather defeatist. Of course defending Sure Start is important, but suggesting the choice is between free education and sure start is like saying “I don’t support fire fighters because i support the NHS”. They’re completely different things and the NUS shouldn’t be doing the government’s job in deciding which cuts are best.
Would he (or whoever he’s calling for delegates to back as his replacement) support the reintroduction of fees in Scotland??
I hope delegates back Mark Bergfeld as he seems the only candidate for NUS president truly committed to the student cause.
Thats disgraceful, Porter ran a campaign of “hunting down” Lib Dems who reneged on their pledge to end HE fees, and now he has done exactly the same, and supports HE fees. What a pathetic hypercrit he is.