Brian Souter: bigot
I remember it clearly. The school may have been conservative, but the teacher herself was really very liberal. “How do gay people have sex?” “I’m sorry, I’m not allowed to talk about that”. “What do you mean, ‘not allowed’?” “It’s against the law – I could lose my job”.
This was the dying days of Section 28 (known in Scotland as Clause 2A, and abolished 3 years before it was in England). The law effectively stated that teachers: “shall not intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality” or “promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship”.
We were flabbergasted. Teachers would often tell us that they didn’t want to talk about something, or that we should get back to work. But we’d never been told that it would be illegal for a teacher to answer a question – especially one that was about basic sex education.
Of course, I’m not sure she was right. You could explain the biological facts of gay sex without ‘promoting homosexuality’. But that, surely, is irrelevant. Because what matters is the impact the law had. And, in effect, it stopped my teachers from telling us that it’s OK to be gay, and from teaching my gay classmates how to ensure any sex they might have was safe.
Homophobic bullying at school was rife anyway. I left school in 2003. I seem to have hit the peek time in which the word ‘gay’ was used as a synonym for ‘bad’ or ‘uncool’. I have a gay uncle, and so was more aware of how offensive this is from an earlier age than I might otherwise have been. But I can believe I fell into the trap more than once.
And, looking back, I can’t imagine what kind of impact that had on any classmates who were growing into their sexuality and discovering that they were lesbian, gay, or bisexual. To discover that something that your friends see as a synonym for ‘bad’ is a fundamental part of your identity must be terrifying. You only need to look at the website of the Albert Kennedy Trust to find the kind of impacts that can have on people’s lives. But teachers were effectively banned from intervening. They could, of course, stop the worst of bullying. But I imagine that for many the culture may well be more damaging than any specific bullying of those believed by their peers to be gay, lesbian or bisexual. And this was a culture reinforced by law.
And I was at school when the Scottish Government moved to abolish Section 28. I think most of my classmates basically supported the move. While they were soft homophobes, when push came to shove, they weren’t bigots.
But Stagecoach magnate Brian Souter disagreed. He poured a million pounds into the ‘Keep the Clause’ campaign. Effectively, the bus tycoon he was throwing the money he’d practically been given through the privatisation of public transport into telling my gay classmates that they weren’t equal. That they should be disgusted by themselves. That the kinds of relationships they wanted weren’t ‘acceptable’. He poured a million pounds into a private ‘referendum’ across Scotland, and whipped the tabloids into a frenzy. As Peter Tatchell has said, it was “The moral equivalent of the business-funded campaign to maintain racial segregation”. Once of Scotland’s richest men basically decided to dedicate himself to leading the bullying of gay teenagers.
In running this campaign, he identified himself clearly as one of Britain’s leading bigots. Just as Nick Griffin or the EDL attack Muslims, Brian Souter launched an all-out assault on the LGBT community. And while his campaign lost, it won a lot of ground. It helped cement the idea that homophobic bigotry is an acceptable position.
And the Government have today further cemented this idea. By giving one of Britain’s leading bigots a knighthood – by honouring someone who dedicates himself to victimising LGBT children – they have shown just how skin deep their support for equality is. Knighthoods have often been given to those who oppress others, or hold views I find to be offensive. But they are rarely given to those who have dedicated much of their lives to becoming one of the country’s leading bigots. Welcome to Cameron’s Britain.
Stagecoach Buses now run to Twatt (Orkney), so Souter’s own buses can now send him a message on their front destination blinds.
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/news/SNP-in-row-over-Brian.6814296.jp
I’m no fan of Cameron but it was the Scottish Government the Knighthood nomination came from in the first place. So it is really Alex/Alex’s minions we have to thank/blame for this.
Not sure I agree that teenagers have to be taught how to have sex by teachers, whether they are gay or straight, I think it is all fairly instinctive. The important message is that it is okay for people to do what they enjoy doing together provided it doesn’t lead to any unwanted consequences.
I think there is a difference between informing and promoting. The problem is that homophones used the term promote to mean inform. They took the view that to even tell teenagers or children that some people are gay and that it is fine was a kind of promotion. The implication that you could promote homosexuality to a heterosexual teenage is absurd.(or vice versa). That kind of discussion can only be relevant to bisexuals!). I hope soutar got his knighthood for something other than homophobia. It would be nice to think that it was bought in the more traditonal way by giving money to the Tories,
Those last 4 words are what stops this site being a well thought out and enjoyable blog where I can read a lot of information that I may or may not disagree with but as least its well written and well presented. Instead this site has to include the hatred of those who disagree with it.
Souter should not have been given his award. That is correct. I am interested in all the recent the angst that is anti-Souter yet pro-Daily Record. Given that papers support for Souter in the referendum I have never bought a copy if it since but their association with homophobia I am confused at the support it is getting from the left.
By the way – Anthony Gerard Hawkhead – Knighted – For services to Environmental Regeneration – Welcome to Camerons Green Britain.
This site must applaud Cameron for being Green now. To follow the logic set out in the post.
Also, welcome to Camerons Britain:
Paul Darren Martin – OBE for services to LGBT community.
Katherine Gillespie-Sells – OBE for services to Disabled LGBT community.
Tim Lucas – OBE for services to LGBT community.
Alexander Messent Cairncross – OBE For services to Environmental Health Overseas
Sophie Churchill – OBE for services to the Environment
Stephen Marsh Smith – OBE for services to the Environment and to Conservation on the Rivers Wye and Usk
Diana Catherine Brett – OBE for For services to the Environment, Sustainable Development and to Humanitarian Issues.
David Andrew Holmes – MBE for services to Environmental Education in Norfolk.
John Angus Mackenzie Innes – MBE for services to the Prevention of Environmental Crime
Norma Catherine Procter – MBE for For services to the Environment and to the community in Gwaelod Y Garth
William John Wilding – MBE for services to the Environment.
Hi Steve,
The best breakdown of how LBGT people vote I know if is done by Pinknews. Their last poll before the last election had the Tories behind Greens:
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/05/04/pinknews.co.uk-poll-finds-tory-vote-drops-further/
Obviously this comes with the usual proviso about this kind of polling – I don’t know their methodology, etc…
what’s with everyone using the term butt fuck?
are we American or something?
out of interest, is it ok to ask if anyone know how the gay vote breaks down? Most gays I’ve known have actually been Conservative voters…
If that’s not an ethical question, just ignore it, please don’t berate me.
Tom1 – What about teaching a guy how to safely butt fuck a girl? Is that ok?
Why do so many bigots think ‘sodomy’ is only that special kind of gay anal guys have?
Re: Your comments on the use of ‘gay’ as a pejorative – SMBC said it best, I think: http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2209#comic
Sums it up much better than I ever could.
Otherwise, very well said! Hear, hear!
sometimes I wish we had a like button for comments on our blog.
Hello,
Thanks for the comments. To those complaining about the last 4 words – it is David Cameron who decided he should be knighted. Of course he is responsible for this – it was his decision. Cameron is as responsible for this as any decision of the government. I am not saying that the Tories will ruthlessly pursue gay people like they did when they introduced section 28. I am just saying that this shows quite how skin deep their support for equality is.
Russ; Your implication that Cameron, his government, or some how his ‘vision’ for Britain is one of institutionalised homophobia is
…exactly what David Cameron, Kenneth Clarke, Mark Francois, Chris Grayling, William Hague, Francis Maude, Patrick McLoughlin, Andrew Mitchell, George Osborne and Sir George Young voted for in 2003. cite
The Conservatives in the European Parliament are allied with some of the most homophobic parties in Europe.
That David Cameron would like to get the pink vote for the Tories in British elections, no doubt: that his vision for Britain is one without institutionalised homophobia – I doubt it.
the last four words are a bit excessive Adam. The rest is fine but surely it’s pretty much what we all know already. Loads of dodgy people get favours from those in power if they’ve been ‘useful’ in the past – there’s nothing particularly different about this government. In fact, they’re rather more benign than what we had in the 80s.
I’m also a secondary science teacher. Those teachers who refused to answer your questions should be ashamed of themselves – I’ve never been censored by anyone in my classroom.
The largest prejudice towards homosexuals these days seems to me to come from religious factions, christian loons and muslim loons in particular, and we should be giving these more grief. Pretty much the rest of modern society (Cameron’s or not) doesn’t really give two hoots anymore.
Tom1 – does anyone really need telling how? Can’t be that much of a riddle can it? I expect those that wish to do so will work it out…
Tom – how can homosexuality be ‘promoted’? Escpecially amongst the many animals who can be homosexual? Are bonobo monkeys ‘taught’ to engage in various types of sex with each other? Dogs? Horses? etc….?
The fact is, a certain proportion of most species on earth will always be homosexual.
Its a shame that the SNP don’t have the courage to tell Souter to get to
As I understand it any political party in parliament can nominate people for knighthoods, on some sort of quota system, but the PM can veto nominations. So the buck stops with Cameron, yes.
tom1: being gay is just as normal as being straight and sex education in schools shouldn’t be promoting ANY sexuality; gay, straight or otherwise. They should be informing teenagers of the practicalities of each and how to stay safe when engaging in sexual relationships – nothing more, nothing less.
Gay teenagers do need to be told “how to buttfuck another guy” in the same way a straight teenager needs to be told how to have heterosexual intercourse. You can’t make a kid gay by telling it how to have sex one way or the other. They either are or they’re not and all you’re doing is preparing them to act out their natural urges.
Russ – watch this video if you’re thinking that David Cameron is in any way commited to gay rights. Oh, and as has been pointed out, it’s the government that nominates those that are given honors, a government lead by Cameron.
and also i like how un-biased this article is.. not.
persecution of gays is never ok, but promoting it and maybe giving children the knowlegde of thinking it is normal isn’t eaither. look at the biological or physical make up of our bodies, being gay is a very hard life and i dont think people should be told how to butt fuck another guy.
not really sure why people are apologising for cameron. unless i’m mistaken it’s his government that nominates the honours lists, and this is the first tory nominated list for fourteen or so years
good post, petition here, well done Adam!
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/notosoutersknighthood/
What Russ said. What has this got to do with David Cameron?
Other than that, well said.
I completely agree with everything you said until the last 4 words. Why on Earth is this the fault of the present government? Because, of course, it’s not like there haven’t been controversial awards offered every year forever before, no matter who the PM is.
Your implication that Cameron, his government, or some how his ‘vision’ for Britain is one of institutionalised homophobia is as baseless as the horrifying assertion that homosexuals are ‘wrong’ that you write about above it.
Just remove the last 4 words. They have no place here.
Regards,