Tabloids insult dead PCs in pursuit of a back-to-the-50s agenda
Above are two front pages, from today’s Mirror and Daily Mail, each carrying stories about one or both of PC Fiona Bone and PC Nicola Hughes, murdered while on duty in Manchester this week. The Mail refers to Constable Hughes as a “WPC”, while the Mirror uses “WPC” as the title of each officer.
Hughes and Bone were not WPCs. They were PCs.
To make such a basic error in writing about a murder victim, killed on duty, is deeply insulting in and of itself. You will remember the lynch-mob attitude of The Sun in particular when Gordon Brown, who is partially sighted, appeared to misspell some words in a hand-written letter of condolence to the mother of a soldier killed in Afghanistan, including her surname.
But this is not just a thoughtless mistake. The WPC title was withdrawn thirteen years ago because it is obviously, nakedly sexist. These papers brought it back for sexist reasons.
The Mirror wish to shock, in order to better sell a story about the easy availability of weapons. To do this they seek to feminise, even infantilise, the officers as much as possible. As well as adding the patronising ‘W’ to the front of their rank, they choose pictures of them not in uniform. They are encouraging us not to think of the women as officers of the law but as juvenile assistants, almost civilians.
The Daily Mail front page bears being taken as a whole to understand the depth of its sexism. The headline concerning the shooting reads, “Murdered WPC and grieving boyfriend she left behind”; above that is the main story, “Doctors sent from UK as Army girl – who didn’t even know she was pregnant – gives birth after Taliban raid”.
Here are two stories – one joyful, one tragic – that in other respects are closely similar. Two women, serving in uniform, thereby confounding the expectations of the Mail, but both redeeming themselves by demonstrating they can have boyfriends and babies too.
In the case of PC Hughes, the archaic ‘W’ serves, amongst other things, to restore a natural hierarchy to the relationship being described. A police officer is a dominant, authority figure; to think of one in a relationship with a man is uncomfortable to some (unless that man is a higher-ranking officer) because it is the man who should be senior. But fortunately, in this treatment, Nicola Hughes is not a police officer, which is a figure of authority; she is a WPC, which is a girl who dresses up in a uniform.
The story of the pregnant soldier, or “Army girl”, is interesting, and I wouldn’t expect it to go unreported. But why is it splashed on the front page of the Mail, Britain’s most misogynist paper? Because it proves to this paper’s satisfaction that no matter how much you may think women can do men’s jobs, they cannot. From Camp Bastion to the boardroom, the only thing keeping the Mail from freaking out at the prevalence of women is the cast-iron certainty that these women are living a lie, they are on borrowed time, they are only pretending to be fully-rounded humans because sooner or later they will get pregnant and the charade of a woman living a complete adult life can be ended.
The Mail is pursuing a poorly-concealed agenda here. While on the face of it these are heroic stories about women in uniformed service, they both serve to constrain women by insisting that their domestic life is their most significant characteristic. Sure enough, the article on the artillerist reports that the event has “led to calls for extra medical checks on women” – we must respond by further questioning women’s ability to serve.
Meanwhile, the Sun asks, “Why? Unarmed women cops were sent to area where Cregan hid”. Leaving aside the fact that Bone and Hughes were responding to a routine burglary report, not knowingly confronting a killer, the Sun obviously find something significant and scandalous in the decision to put women in harm’s way. “Women cops,” presumably, should not be sent to areas where gunmen may be hiding; they should be doing the filing and making tea for moustachioed detectives in Ford Capris.
These insults show how powerful the sexism of the newspapers involved is. Even respect for the dead and the media’s veneration of uniformed service combined are not sufficient to persuade them to treat women as people. Not only do they disrespect the individuals involved through their coverage, they manipulate their deaths to support an anti-feminist, back-to-the-50s political agenda whose essence is disrespecting all women.
It’s an amazing article designed for all the web visitors; they will obtain advantage from
it I am sure.
Review my page Henry
Some schools offer this degree online where students can graduate faster, but any chef would agree that ‘hands on experience’ is crucial in this field.
This happens to be a diet recipes lose weight fast tutorial
about the fastest method to drop weight and get your self
inside the process in the exciting voyage you happen to be going to
These powerful corporations all began as small business owners, as well as some of them were founded by men who found success later
in life. Unlike meat, eggs, and dairy foods, plant-based
foods are reduced fat and calories and full of fiber and sophisticated carbohydrates.
生誕祭きたああああああああああああああああああああああああああ 5 2 kuren opskrifter article この頃は大島といえばまいまいだったもんな
Thirteen years? I had no idea it was retired so long ago. The papers – nearly all of them – have never stopped using it.
Goodness, what a load of self-serving claptrap. Forget the bastardisation of the language to fit tabloid lunacy, forget the gung ho approach to sophisticated issues that the tabloids take – these are all par for the course and have been part of reporting since the pamphlets of the mid 1600s turned into newspapers.
How you can make so many words out of the reporting of two police women and a female soldier, who let’s face it would not be serving at any front line that didn’t include a sink 50 years ago, and miss the point, is beyond me. Do you really have so little grasp of what people feel on these occasions to think that banging a drum like this does nothing but talk to an insular and side-lined minority and lose points with people that count for what is a good cause – the equality of women in our society.
Seeing a pregnant Faye White summarising the England game against Croatia last night reminded me of that awkward moment during the Olympics when Gary Lineker asked her if she had any regrets about missing her chance to play for Great Britain. I still cringe now.
This whole case has been full of sexism. Even on respected TV news, such as the BBC and Channel 4, the way they talk about the police officers is ‘women police officers’. As if their gender is somehow important. I don’t think if they were men it would be reported as ‘2 male police officers’.
What are you doing reading the Sun?